Legal Opinion

Consumer Direct, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1991No. 90-2484PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the commissioner on both issues under appeal and reverse the decision of the BTA.

Former R.C. 5733.051(A)(2) and (8), for the pertinent years, provided:

“Net income of a corporation subject to the tax imposed by this chapter shall be allocated and apportioned to this state as follows:
“(2) Net rents and royalties from tangible personal property, to the extent such property is utilized in this state, are allocable to this state, if the taxpayer is otherwise subject to the tax provided by this chapter;
“(8) Any other net income, from sources other than those enumerated in subdivisions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Valco Cincinnati, Inc. v. N & D Machining Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McLean Trucking Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vanguard Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Edwards Transfer & Storage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Lucas County Board of Commissioners v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mp Totalcare Services, Inc. v. MattimoeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  5. Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc. v. HaenszelOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API