Legal Opinion

Eric Crouse v. Housing Works, Deschutes County, and the State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 3, 2025No. 6:25-cv-00547Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION ERIC CROUSE, Case No. 6:25-cv-00547-AP Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. HOUSING WORKS, DESCHUTES COUNTY, and the STATE OF OREGON, Defendants. ______________________________________ POTTER, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Eric “Eran” Crouse alleges that Defendant Housing Works has “repeatedly failed to provide meaningful housing accommodations.” Compl. 6, ECF No. 1. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Deschutes County and State of Oregon failed to act to secure Plaintiff appropriate housing, “despite their full…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API