Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Saucedo v. Lane
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 19, 1984No. 84 C 7206PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*338MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Carlos Salcido (“Salcido”)1 brings a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) challenging his state court murder conviction because of the allegedly improper admission of his confession at trial. Illinois Department of Corrections Director Michael Lane (“Lane”) has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, summary judgment is granted.
Applicable Legal Principles
Ordinarily this Court’s opinions begin with a review of the facts. But because the critical question here is the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Winfield C. Patterson v. Julius T. Cuyler, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Brownstein v. Director, Illinois Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States ex rel. Rosa v. NealDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988