Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Rosa v. Neal

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 13, 1988No. 88 C 3426PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

David Rosa (“Rosa”) initially filed a pro se in forma pauperis petition against Dan-ville Correctional Center Warden Michael Neal (“Neal”), seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”). After this Court appointed counsel to represent Rosa,1 respondent Neal answered the petition and moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56, made applicable to this proceeding by Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (“Section 2254 Rules”). For the reasons stated in this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Rosa v. NealDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API