Legal Opinion
State v. Bost
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 12, 1992No. 89-3565-C-3, 89-3564-C-3 CA A63879 (Control), A64175PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*521BUTTLER, J.
Defendants are brothers. Glen was indicted for manufacture of a controlled substance, and Dennis was charged with manufacture and possession of controlled substances. The cases were consolidated in the trial court and on appeal. The trial court granted both defendants’ motions to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant on the ground that the executing officers violated ORS 133.575(2):
“The executing officer shall, before entering the premises, give appropriate notice of the identity, authority and purpose of the officer to the person to be searched, or to the person in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ArceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. BostOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. BostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992