Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1912No. Sac. No. 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County. K. S. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action is brought to have declared void a certain judgment of foreclosure and deed issued upon a sale thereunder, as also a subsequent deed from plaintiffs to the defendant Gray, and for a decree that plaintiffs are the owners of the real property described in said foreclosure judgment and said deeds and that said Gray and the other defendants hold said property in trust for plaintiffs. A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained and plaintiffs declining to amend judgment was entered in favor of the defendants and from the judgment plaintiffs appeal.

The complaint in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrissey v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bloniarz v. RolosonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Bagley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. James v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Elias v. Boone Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Colquhoun v. PackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API