Bagley v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to quiet title to certain real property in San Francisco and the judgment in favor of defendants was rendered upon an agreed statement of facts. It appears that, on November 9, 1869, one Charles F. Hamilton and Monroe Greenwood became the owners of the premises by virtue of a deed from the city and county of San Francisco. Hamilton died on November 14,1872, leaving a will, by which he disposed of all of his personal property and directed, in a codicil thereto, that his executors sell all of his real property in the city and county of San Francisco and invest the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Harvey v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- National Bank v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Latta v. Western Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Hoover v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Warden v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Tatum v. Iowa Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Bagley v. DevlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.