Legal Opinion
Toth v. USX Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 1, 1988No. 88 C 2135PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Defendant USX Corporation (“USX”) and Defendant United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC (“USWA”) move this court pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons stated herein, USX and USWA’s motions are granted, and plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed in its entirety.
I. FACTS
Plaintiffs are 15 USWA staff representatives who were active employees of USX prior to joining the union staff on a full-time basis. Each began his employment with USX 30 or more years ago and at various times prior…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert J. Meza v. General Battery Corporation and Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Andrew Toth v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Helmer v. BriodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990