Legal Opinion
Helmer v. Briody
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 26, 1990No. 89 Civ. 0467 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Ed”) has moved for summary judgment in accordance with Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the action *1022against it brought by plaintiff Henry J. Helmer (“Helmer”) to obtain reinstatement by Con Ed. The motion was heard and submitted on July 6, 1990 and in accordance with facts and conclusions set forth below is granted.
This motion is perhaps almost the last skirmish, albeit a vital one, in the battle Helmer has waged since the fall of 1989 to recover his position with his union, the Utility Workers Union of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sheila Conkle v. Sulinna Jeong, D/B/A Laird's Food Market Baldwin Jeong Local 1179, United Food and Commercial Workers InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Helmer v. BriodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991