Legal Opinion

United States v. Mouling

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 27, 2009No. 05-3206PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence on drug and gun offenses, arguing (1) that the district court’s use of compound voir dire questions prevented him from learning about possible juror bias; (2) that the district court committed multiple errors in determining his sentence; and (3) that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Although we have repeatedly expressed our concerns about compound voir dire questions, in this case we are limited to reviewing the district court’s actions for plain…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Jose Escalante-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States ex rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API