Legal Opinion

Buie v. Johnston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1981No. 8018SC1091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

By their sole assignment of error, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred by refusing to grant a mandatory injunction requiring the defendant to remove the existing incomplete foundation. We agree.

We find Ingle v. Stubbins, 240 N.C. 382, 82 S.E. 2d 388 (1954), controlling. Ingle was also an action to enjoin a defendant from violating restrictive covenants of a residential subdivision. The covenant at issue therein provided that no building should be located nearer than 50 feet from the front line of the subdivision lots. Lots 10 and 11 faced Bueno Street or Wildwood Lane…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Sterling Realty Co. v. TredennickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Mills v. HTL Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Currin v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Buie v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Buie v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API