Legal Opinion

McINTOSH v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 1, 2009No. 01-08-00582-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 50, we withdraw our July 23, 2009 opinion, substitute this opinion in its place, and vacate our July 23, 2009 judgment.1

A jury found appellant, John Paul McIntosh, guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation,2 and the trial court, after finding true the allegation in one enhancement paragraph that appellant had one prior felony conviction, assessed his punishment at confinement for ten years. In three points of error, appellant contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Corey Jules Teamer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  2. Brandon Robinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  3. Brian Darnell Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016
  4. Charles Windham v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
  5. Charles Windham v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API