In re Condemnation By The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission of 14.38 Acres In Fee Simple
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
This appeal presents two issues related to damages for a governmental taking pursuant to the Eminent Domain Code, 26 Pa. Stat. §§ 1-101 — 1-903 (Supp.1997). The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission challenges the Commonwealth Court’s decision that it is the function of the jury, rather than the court, to determine whether a eondemnee is entitled to damages under the Assembled Economic Unit Doctrine. In addition, the Turnpike Commission challenges the award of appraisal and attorneys’ fees to both the owners and a lessee of the condemned property. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Singer v. Oil City Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Benjamin & Fannie Kellman Trust Fund, Dart Supply, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- City of Chester v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Graham Realty Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Chester Municipal Authority v. DelpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGaffic v. Redevelopment Authority of New CastleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In Re De Facto Condemnation & Taking of Lands of WBF Associates, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Murray v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- In re Condemnation Proceeding by South Whitehall Township AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re De Facto Condemnation & Taking of Lands of WBF AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.