Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re De Facto Condemnation & Taking of Lands of WBF Associates

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2006No. 172 MAP 2004, 173 MAP 2004, 174 MAP 2004Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

I agree with the majority’s legal conclusion in Part I of its opinion that delay compensation should be due in favor of WBF Associates, but I would offer different reasons in support of this decision and believe that the availability of delay damages should be ultimately contingent upon jury findings in the de novo appeal; I respectfully differ with majority’s holding concerning the allowance of mortgage interest as a separate component of damages above and apart from delay compensation; and I would affirm the Commonwealth Court’s holding on the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API