Legal Opinion

Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Peairs

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 27, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 89-0118PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROLL, Judge.

Dr. Richard Peairs appeals from the trial court’s granting of a preliminary injunction enforcing the terms of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract between Dr. Peairs and Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgery, Ltd. (POS). The restrictive covenant prohibits him from practicing orthopaedic medicine and orthopaedic surgery within a five-mile radius of the offices of POS. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

FACTS

POS is a professional corporation of or-thopaedic surgeons. The four shareholders are four physicians who practice out of three offices in northwest Phoenix. °

In…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. McRand, Inc. v. Van BeelenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1983
  5. Coronado Co. v. Jacome's Department Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Weber v. TillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Laidlaw, Inc. v. Student Transportation of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  5. Compass Bank v. HartleyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API