Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Peairs
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROLL, Judge.
Dr. Richard Peairs appeals from the trial court’s granting of a preliminary injunction enforcing the terms of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract between Dr. Peairs and Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgery, Ltd. (POS). The restrictive covenant prohibits him from practicing orthopaedic medicine and orthopaedic surgery within a five-mile radius of the offices of POS. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
FACTS
POS is a professional corporation of or-thopaedic surgeons. The four shareholders are four physicians who practice out of three offices in northwest Phoenix. °
In…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- McRand, Inc. v. Van BeelenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1983
- Coronado Co. v. Jacome's Department Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Weber v. TillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Laidlaw, Inc. v. Student Transportation of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Compass Bank v. HartleyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.