Madigan v. Maas
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] The appellant, Patrick F. Madigan (Madigan) and the appellee, Tammy J. Maas (Maas) married in 1994. They divorced in 2004. In this appeal, Madigan challenges the district court’s property division in that divorce. We will affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Madigan presents the following issues for our review:
1. Whether the decree of divorce should be corrected to conform to the decision letter of the district court?
2. Whether the monetary award of $22,000.00 to Maas must be adjusted because it is contrary to the evidence and clearly erroneous?
FACTS
[¶ 3] Madigan and Maas married in 1994.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Metz v. MetzWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Sweat v. SweatWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Holland v. HollandWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kevin R. Carbaugh v. Nancy B. Nichols, f/k/a Nancy B. CarbaughWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Forbis v. ForbisWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Pond v. PondWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Moss v. MossWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Laura Marie Lewis v. Ryan Ike LewisWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.