Legal Opinion

Holland v. Holland

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2001No. 00-291PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Brad Holland (Husband), seeks review of isolated provisions of an order of the district court, which he claims erroneously divided his premarital assets, as well as an inheritance he received during the year preceding the divorcee with Appellee, Karen Holland (Wife). Husband also asserts that a lifetime non-competition agreement to which he stipulated during trial is unenforceable as a matter of law.

[¶2] We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶3] Husband's brief states these issues:

1. Did the district court abuse its discretion by dividing appellant's inheritance received by him…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lord v. LordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Ridley v. KroutWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. David A. Pope, CPA LLC and David A. Pope, Individually v. Mary C. RosenbergWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hoffman v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Root v. RootWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API