Holland v. Holland
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶1] Appellant, Brad Holland (Husband), seeks review of isolated provisions of an order of the district court, which he claims erroneously divided his premarital assets, as well as an inheritance he received during the year preceding the divorcee with Appellee, Karen Holland (Wife). Husband also asserts that a lifetime non-competition agreement to which he stipulated during trial is unenforceable as a matter of law.
[¶2] We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶3] Husband's brief states these issues:
1. Did the district court abuse its discretion by dividing appellant's inheritance received by him…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Lord v. LordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Ridley v. KroutWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Welch v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- David A. Pope, CPA LLC and David A. Pope, Individually v. Mary C. RosenbergWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Hoffman v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Root v. RootWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.