Legal Opinion

Bobby Joe Thomas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1972No. 71-1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

1Per curiam

Thomas raises two contentions on this petition for rehearing. Both are without merit.

First, Thomas alleges that he was subjected to double jeopardy when, upon the new trial we ordered in Thomas v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 418 F. 2d 567, he was tried upon two of the three counts in the indictment which the original trial judge had treated as sur-plusage for the purposes of sentencing. Thomas had been convicted at his original trial on all six counts of the indictment. But this contention is wide of the mark “since it is based on the false assumption that the court’s failure to sentence him…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Bobby Joe Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Donald Lee Forrester v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. John Medford RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Watts v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Herbert Joseph Dell v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API