United States v. John Medford Rogers
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for possessing counterfeited obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472. His sole contention is that the conviction must be vacated because of lack of formal arraignment proceedings. We affirm.
At a call of a criminal docket of the District Court appellant was not formally arraigned as required by Fed.R.Crim. P. 10, which provides:
Arraignment shall be conducted in open court and shall consist of reading the indictment or information to the defendant or stating to him the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Joseph Monroe McConnell Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Herbert Joseph Dell v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Bobby Joe Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. LalondeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Armando Correa-VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Robert R. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Alex R. Grote, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- City of Fargo v. BommersbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.