Legal Opinion

United States v. John Medford Rogers

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1972No. 71-3549PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

Appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for possessing counterfeited obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472. His sole contention is that the conviction must be vacated because of lack of formal arraignment proceedings. We affirm.

At a call of a criminal docket of the District Court appellant was not formally arraigned as required by Fed.R.Crim. P. 10, which provides:

Arraignment shall be conducted in open court and shall consist of reading the indictment or information to the defendant or stating to him the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Joseph Monroe McConnell Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Herbert Joseph Dell v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Bobby Joe Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. LalondeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Armando Correa-VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Robert R. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Alex R. Grote, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. City of Fargo v. BommersbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API