Legal Opinion
Joffe v. King & Spalding LLP
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided October 2, 2018No. 1:17-cv-03392 (VEC) (SDA)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is that part of a motion by Plaintiff's former counsel, Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & Sinins ("Javerbaum Wurgaft") (ECF No. 79), to affix a charging lien. For the following reasons, the motion by Javerbaum Wurgaft is GRANTED to the extent of affixing a charging lien in an amount to be determined.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural History
In this case, which was filed on May 8, 2017, Plaintiff David A. Joffe ("Plaintiff" or "Joffe"), a former litigation associate at the law firm King & Spalding LLP ("King & Spalding"), contends…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Stair v. CalhounDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Klein v. EubankNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barros v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Fullsend, Inc. v. Cannafellas Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Hall v. ArchcareDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Joffe v. Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & SininsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Joffe v. King & Spalding LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.