Joffe v. Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & Sinins
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
19-3516-cv Joffe v. Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & Sinins UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Klein v. EubankNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cassie Sutton v. New York City Transit Authority, Steven Sardisco, Michael Demeo, Docket No. 04-0429-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield Cnty., Inc. v. Litchfield Historic Dist. Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Joffe v. King & Spalding LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.