Sei Corp. v. Norton & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for reconsideration of their motion for a new trial and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and defendant Alexander B. van Putten’s motion to set aside the judgment against him.
FACTS
On October 19, 1984, plaintiff SEI Corporation (“SEI”) filed a complaint only against Norton & Company, a limited partnership (“Norton”). On December 13, 1984, an answer and counterclaim were filed by attorneys for Norton & Company. On December 28, 1984, the court entered its scheduling Order in accordance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall, Secretary of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Reifsnyder v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Apex Financial Corp. v. DeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- In Re Record Club of America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mercy Catholic Medical Center v. Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Abednego v. St. Croix Alumina, LLCSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Garczynski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.