Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Higgins v. Hoctor

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1933PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an application to this court for writ of habeascorpus. The application for writ, made by the attorneys for Mary E. Moynihan, states that she is unlawfully deprived of her liberty by the superintendent of the State Insane Hospital No. 4 at Farmington, Missouri. The writ was issued and it is shown by the return of the superintendent of the State Insane Hospital and the reply thereto petitioner and the certified copies of the record attached to these pleadings that as stated in the statement in petitioner's brief:

"A proceeding to have Mary E. Moynihan, the petitioner herein, declared of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. BockstruckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bullard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. People v. ReevesIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Ellern v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Barry v. HallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. In Re LinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API