Legal Opinion

County Council v. E. L. Gardner, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 30, 1982No. [No. 11, September Term, 1981.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavidson, J.

This case presents a question concerning nonconforming uses. More particularly, it involves the question whether, under the applicable provisions of the Prince George’s County Code (1979), Subtitle 27.Zoning, the owner of a nonconforming surface mining sand and gravel operation can obtain a special exception to operate a sand and gravel wet-processing facility at the same location. The relevant provisions of the Prince George’s County Code are as follows.

Section 27-101 provides in pertinent part:

"(a) Terms used in this Subtitle are defined as follows:
"(110.1) Nonconforming Building or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Hewitt v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Colati v. JiroutCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Beyer v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County Council v. Zimmer Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Lone v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. County Commissioners of Carroll County v. ZentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Rotter v. Coconino CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Foley v. K. Hovnanian at Kent Island, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API