Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 9, 1948No. [No. 34, October Term, 1948.]PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

As originally passed, Ordinance No. 1247 of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, known as the Zoning Ordinance, provided in Paragraph 34 that a filling station for the sale of inflammable liquids should be permitted only by authority of public ordinance of the Mayor and City Council, even in a district where such use of property was not prohibited by the general use regulations. Under this provision numerous ordinances were passed by the Mayor and City Council permitting the erection of filling stations in various parts of the city, but this method was subsequently abandoned, and by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benner v. TribbittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Ellicott v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Colati v. JiroutCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Sugar v. North Baltimore Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Kahl v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  3. Montgomery County v. Merlands Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  4. Scott v. Board of AdjustmentTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hewitt v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API