Legal Opinion · Dissent

Porenta v. Porenta

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2017No. Case No. 20160243Published

1Dissent

Associate Chief Justice Lee, dissenting:

¶ 56 Robert Porenta transferred marital property to his mother (Louise Porenta) while he was going through a divorce with his wife (Patricia Porenta). Robert then died while the divorce case was pending-before a divorce decree issued. Patricia now seeks to recover the property from Louise via a claim under the Utah Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA).

¶ 57 The property transfer was apparently fraudulent under the UFTA at the time of the transfer. But Patricia cannot recover under the UFTA unless she identifies a "claim" (as defined in the UFTA) against Robert…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hidden Meadows Development Co. v. MillsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Knickerbocker v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Timm v. DewsnupUtah Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API