Legal Opinion

In re Yum! Brands, Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided December 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-00463-CRSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. SIMPSON III, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (DN 82) of Defendants Yum! Brands, Inc. (‘Yum!” or the “Company”), David C. Novak, Richard T. Carucci, and Jing-Shyh S. Su (“Individual Defendants”). Defendants request that the Court dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) (DN 72) with prejudice for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (DN 82).

I. BACKGROUND

A. Parties and Claims

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Anderson v. Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  3. Newtyn Partners, LP v. Alliance Data Sys. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
  4. Porter v. GrafTech International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
  5. The Porter Casino Resort, Inc. v. Georgia Gaming Investment, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API