Legal Opinion

Benavidez v. Benavidez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 2, 1999No. 97C-13045; CA A101104PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his personal injury claim, ORCP 21 A(2), because of failure to adequately serve defendant, Crystal Newkirk, 1 within 60 days of filing the complaint. ORCP 7; ORS 12.020. Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff’s method of service was inadequate and contends that that service satisfied the requirements of ORCP 7 D(l) because it was reasonably calculated to apprise defendant of the pendency of the action. We reverse and remand.

For the purposes of this appeal, the material facts are undisputed: On September 4,1995,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lake Oswego Review, Inc. v. SteinkampOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Jordan v. WiserOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Paschall v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerean v. Martin-JovenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Gerean v. Martin-JovenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Roberts v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API