Benavidez v. Benavidez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his personal injury claim, ORCP 21 A(2), because of failure to adequately serve defendant, Crystal Newkirk, 1 within 60 days of filing the complaint. ORCP 7; ORS 12.020. Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff’s method of service was inadequate and contends that that service satisfied the requirements of ORCP 7 D(l) because it was reasonably calculated to apprise defendant of the pendency of the action. We reverse and remand.
For the purposes of this appeal, the material facts are undisputed: On September 4,1995,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Lake Oswego Review, Inc. v. SteinkampOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Jordan v. WiserOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Paschall v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gerean v. Martin-JovenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Gerean v. Martin-JovenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Roberts v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001