Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 30, 2007No. Docket 05-6919-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

After a remand for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), the district judge (Jed S. Rakoff, Judge) gave an oral explanation that adequately explained the below-Guidelines sentence imposed, but the court did not include a written statement of reasons for the sentence in the written order of judgment as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). 1 Hall filed a notice of appeal. Assigned counsel thereafter submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), seeking to be relieved as counsel. The Government, in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. VerkhoglyadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Kevin FuertesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. Portalatin v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. 777 Greene AvenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. ElbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API