United States v. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
After a remand for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), the district judge (Jed S. Rakoff, Judge) gave an oral explanation that adequately explained the below-Guidelines sentence imposed, but the court did not include a written statement of reasons for the sentence in the written order of judgment as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). 1 Hall filed a notice of appeal. Assigned counsel thereafter submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), seeking to be relieved as counsel. The Government, in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. VerkhoglyadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Kevin FuertesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Portalatin v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. 777 Greene AvenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ElbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.