Mott v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The petitioner is the landlord of a rent-regulated accommodation governed by the provisions of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (hereinafter the ETPA) (see, McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 8621, et seq; L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended). The District Rent Administrator rendered a determination in favor of the tenant, the respondent Salz, and on February 5, 1985, the petitioner mailed a petition for administrative review (hereinafter PAR) to the respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New York (hereinafter the DHCR), challenging the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- 140 West 57th Street Corp. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Bloom v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Schoenstein v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
4Cited by9 opinions
- Mott v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Daniel v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. NunezNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Raynes Associates Ltd. Partnership v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Dorchester Associates v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.