Legal Opinion
Daniel v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William J. Davis, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioners seek judicial review of overcharge claims that were either wrongfully denied or are still pending with respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR).
I. Facts and Contentions
Petitioners are a small group of tenants who occupied various apartments in the building located at 170 East 83rd Street, New York, New York, which is owned by respondent Valer ay Real Estate Company, Inc. (Valeray). Petitioners filed eight separate rent overcharge complaints with DHCR in 1992. Some of these…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State of NY v. Cortelle Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Gilbert v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- MATTER OF FANELLI v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dunkum v. MacEck Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Baumes v. LavineNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnston Ambulatory Surgical Associates, Ltd. v. NolanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Brinckerhoff v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Johnston Ambulatory Surgical Associates, Ltd. v. NolanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000