Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Lawyers Title Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 09-841PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SLOMSKY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The matter before the Court arises from an alleged fraudulent scheme in which Defendant Lawyers Title Insurance Company (“Lawyers”), through various title agents, misrepresented the amount of money due and owing for title insurance. According to Plaintiffs, unsuspecting homeowners who secured mortgages and paid for title insurance were defrauded through the pervasive scheme. On February 26, 2009, Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover the wrongfully obtained funds. On November 5, 2012, after a period of delay in this case, Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Macauley v. Estate of NicholasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 20 Welfare & Benefit Fund v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018
  3. Fleetwood Servs., LLC v. Complete Bus. Solutions Grp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. A & B Campbell Family v. Chesakpeake Energy CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. A&B Campbell Family LLC, et al. v. Williams Partners, L.P., et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API