National Labor Relations Board v. Conover Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the usual statutory proceedings under Section 10 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., the National *780Labor Relations Board found that the Con-over Motor Company, the Phelps Brothers Service Company and the Strang Garage Company, have refused and are refusing to bargain collectively with the certified representatives of their employees in violation of Section 8, subsection (a) (1) and (5) of the Act; that such unfair labor practices affect' commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Polish National Alliance of the United States v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ken Rose Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Conover Motor Co. National Labor Relations Board v. Phelps Bros. Service. National Labor Relations Board v. Strang Garage CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. HallamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. HallamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Peerless Quarries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951