Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
*153Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg join,
dissenting.
I cannot agree that the backpay award before us “runs counter to,” or “trenches upon,” national immigration policy. Ante, at 147,149 (citing the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA)). As all the relevant agencies (including the Department of Justice) have told us, the National Labor Relations Board’s limited backpay order will not interfere with the implementation of immigration policy. Rather, it reasonably helps to deter unlawful activity that both labor laws and immigration laws…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.