Legal Opinion
State v. Buddhu
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2001No. AC 20212PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
In this criminal case, the state appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the substitute information charging the defendant, Deowraj Buddhu, with 142 violations of the Penal Code.1 At issue is the court’s ruling prohibiting the state from introducing, in its case-in-chief, evidence that the police *106officers seized while executing a search warrant for the residence of the defendant and his son, Satesh Buddhu. On appeal, the state claims that the court improperly concluded that the warrant was invalid and, therefore, should not have suppressed the evidence that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JarrettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. BuddhuSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. BuddhuSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001