Legal Opinion
People v. Tansey
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Fried, J.
Defendants, James Tansey and Vernon Smith, are charged *235in two separate indictments with similar crimes arising out of their alleged possession of stolen New York State telephone authorization codes, similar to telephone calling card numbers, that were used to obtain telephone services. Because there are common issues raised in their motions to dismiss each indictment, I will address them in a single decision. I will then turn to the separate arguments raised by each defendant challenging other crimes with which each alone has been charged: Smith’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. DelanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- People v. BardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. HaskellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. Vanguard Meter Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. HolleyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.