Legal Opinion

People v. Barden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 2014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Acosta, J.

This appeal raises questions about the elements of identity theft and whether intangible property can be criminally pos*220sessed, where a defendant used his associate’s credit card number to pay for hotel expenses without authorization. Specifically, we are called upon to determine, first, whether assumption of identity is a discrete element of identity theft or whether it occurs automatically when a person uses another’s personal identifying information, and second, whether criminal possession of stolen property includes intangible property, namely a credit card…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ManiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. FinneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. HarperNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. Gilbert Gottlieb & 220 Crescent, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. SpatarellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. YusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Matter of Luis C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Angela Natalie Fox A/K/A Angela Natalie Jarvis v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. AleynikovNew York Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API