Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Inman, Akers & Inman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 30, 1912No. 3749, 3750PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action for penalty; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. September 21, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

These were actions brought in 1910 under the provisions of the act approved August 23, 1905 (Acts 1905, p. 120), to recover from the railway company for its failure to promptly furnish cars ordered at various times during the years 1906 and 1907. The point is made that the actions were barred by the statute of limitations, and as we have reached the conclusion that this point is well taken, no other question need be dealt with. .

A consideration of the question upon which the case turns renders it necessary to classify the nature of the recovery authorized by section 2 of the act of 1905 and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Pennington & Evans v. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. McDonald v. Town of LudowiciCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Atlanta Sand & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duke v. Helena-Glendale Ferry Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  2. Greene v. Lam Amusement Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1956
  3. Anderson v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Busbee v. GillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RabunCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API