Legal Opinion
In re E.D.P.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1990No. 89-61PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant E.D.P., Jr., appeals from his adjudication of delinquency for violation of D.C.Code § 22-505(a) (1986) for assault on District of Columbia employees charged with supervising juveniles confined in District of Columbia facilities, on the grounds that the trial judge improperly applied the doctrine of “transferred intent” and that the statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We affirm.
*1308I
On June 24, 1988, appellant was confined in the Oak Hill Youth Center in Laurel, Maryland, serving a two-year commitment. On that date, another detainee, W.F., came to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McIntosh v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Washington Mobilization Committee v. Maurice J. Cullinane, Chief of the Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- O'CONNOR v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Frances Rogala v. District of Columbia and Ephriam Williams, Officer, Badge 4357Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- State v. JuliusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re C.L.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.