Legal Opinion

Ahn v. Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 2014No. E054322PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc. (Kumho), and Korea Express U.S.A., Inc. (Korea Express), on plaintiffs’ unverified complaint for breach of contract and common counts. The motion was based on plaintiffs’ “factually devoid” responses to defendants’ “state all facts” special interrogatories and requests for production in which plaintiffs generally stated they did not know whether any facts or documents supported various allegations of their complaint. (Union Bank v. Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 573,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Scripps Mem'l Hosp. La Jolla, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Alexander v. Scripps Memorial Hospital La JollaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Dispatch & Tracking Solutions v. City of San Diego CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Assn. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API