Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Morris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1940No. 4-6004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

This action was instituted by John H. Morris, executor and trustee of the last will and testament and of the estate of Simon Blumenstiel, deceased, against Alfred Blumenstiel, Ruth Blumenstiel, Mary Ruth Murphy, and George W. Murphy. It was alleged that the appellee, Morris, was executor and trustee, and that the last will and testament, and especially the codicil of said last will and testament of Simon Blumenstiel, deceased, contained the following provision:

“Second: I desire to make provision in this codicil to my will for the education in college of Mary Ruth Murphy and George W. Murphy,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shepard v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Eagle v. OldhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Ellsworth v. Arkansas Natl. Bk., TrusteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Union National Bank v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. AycockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Rufty v. BrantlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Blumenstiel v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Martin v. Simmons First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Walt v. BevisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API