Legal Opinion

Martin v. Simmons First National Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 24, 1971No. 5-5448PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

The chancery court held that the separate assets and income of Ouita Martin should be taken into consideration before the trustee of a trust for her benefit, created by the will of her sister, Elizabeth Nichol, could invade the corpus of the trust for Miss Martin’s hospital, medical, drug and nursing expenses. Appellant contends that, under the circumstances existing here, she is not required to exhaust all her resources, or even her income, before these expenses are paid for by the trustee.

Determination of the principal questions involved on this appeal depends upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eagle v. OldhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Bohn v. BohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Murphy v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Rufty v. BrantlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Cross v. PharrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. First Community Bancshares, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bailey v. Delta Trust & BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Armstrong v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Estate of Robertson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. In Re Estate of ConoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API