Sandsberry v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACH.
Texas Supreme Court
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Smith,
joined by Justices Griffin and McCall dissenting.
I most respectfully dissent. In this case the respondents, Labor Unions, in attempting to deny the petitioners-individuals, the right not to join a union are, in effect, destroying the *348principle of constitutional liberty upon which their very existence is founded. The Union’s effort to compel the Santa Fe to enter into the proposed contract which would ultimately bring about compulsory union membership cannot be sustained by the courts and such a contract between private parties (the unions and the Santa Fe) is not insulated…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.