Legal Opinion

Hollers v. Campbell County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1951PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer and dismissing the suit. The plaintiffs sued Campbell County for damages for changing and raising the grade of a pike near their property, causing water flowing and draining on said pike to flow on their property washing some of the surface away and causing the soil to he damp and soggy. Plaintiffs claim that said acts on the part of the county cause the waters falling on said pike and draining thereon to change their natural and regular course of flow and cause the said waters falling and accumulating and draining…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Hamilton County v. RapeTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Barron v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Knox County v. Lemarr Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Buckholtz v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Denny v. Wilson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Pleasant View Utility District v. VradenburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Morgan County v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  4. Carter County v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  5. Hawkins v. DawnTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API