Legal Opinion

Knox County v. Lemarr Et Ux.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 1, 1936No. 1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeAMIS, J.

Defendants in error, W. P. Lemarr and wife, instituted this action against Knox county for damages to their property alleged to have been caused by a change in the grade of Shannondale road. Prom a verdict and ¡judgment in the amount of .$250, the county has appealed in error to this court. Por convenience we will refer to the parties as plaintiffs and defendant.

Plaintiffs purchased the property in question in 1920, the deed calling for the center of the road. At that time Shannondale road, ■upon which the property abuts for a distance of 11% poles, was used and maintained as a county…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamilton County v. RapeTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Coyne v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Shelby County v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  4. Morgan County v. GoansTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. City of Knoxville v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Shelby County v. BardenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Callahan v. Town of MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  5. Balog v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API