Legal Opinion

Pleasant View Utility District v. Vradenburg

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1977PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Chief Justice.

Respondents, Joel Vradenburg and wife, Donna Vradenburg, filed an action in the Chancery Court of Cheatham County in an effort to have that court enjoin the petitioner, Pleasant View Utility District, from discharging waste water onto respondents’ land. The respondents charged that the water does not drain properly, creating a swampy area which is a breeding ground for mosquitos and bacteria, and that the waste water pollutes the fish pond which respondents constructed on their land.

In the course of pleading, petitioner moved to dismiss the action,1 primarily on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan County v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  2. East Tennessee & W. N. C. R. v. GougeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. Hollers v. Campbell CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Jones v. Hamilton CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  5. Monday v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Edwards v. Hallsdale-Powell Utility District Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. John Patterson (Pat) O'CallaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Betty v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. Cameo Bobo v. City of Jackson, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API