Legal Opinion

Rosthenhausler v. State ex rel. Eyman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 27, 1968No. 2 CA-HC 96Published

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

The petitioner herein has instituted these habeas corpus proceedings to challenge the validity of the sentence he is presently-serving upon his conviction of a second, offense of joyriding, a felony under A.R.S.. § 13-672, subsec. B. The petitioner contends :

“ * * * that the felony sentence which he is now serving is null and void, by virtue of use of an invalid prior misdemeanor to statutorily enhance the crime of joyriding to a felony status under A.R.S. 13-672 (B).”

and:

“ * * * the prior misdemeanor is invalid for the reason that the conviction; was obtained in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Burt v. City of Palm SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States ex rel. Durocher v. LaValleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. In re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API