Legal Opinion
Rosthenhausler v. State ex rel. Eyman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 27, 1968No. 2 CA-HC 96Published
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
The petitioner herein has instituted these habeas corpus proceedings to challenge the validity of the sentence he is presently-serving upon his conviction of a second, offense of joyriding, a felony under A.R.S.. § 13-672, subsec. B. The petitioner contends :
“ * * * that the felony sentence which he is now serving is null and void, by virtue of use of an invalid prior misdemeanor to statutorily enhance the crime of joyriding to a felony status under A.R.S. 13-672 (B).”
and:
“ * * * the prior misdemeanor is invalid for the reason that the conviction; was obtained in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Burt v. City of Palm SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States ex rel. Durocher v. LaValleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- In re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.