Legal Opinion
Noatex Corp. v. King Construction of Houston LLC
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided May 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-00137-GHDPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF NOATEX CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
GLEN H. DAVIDSON, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the undersigned is Plaintiff Noatex Corporation’s motion for attorney’s fees [66]. Upon due consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be denied.1
A. Factual and Procedural Background
Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc. (“APMM”) contracted with Noatex Corporation (“Noatex”) for Noatex to construct an auto parts manufacturing facility in Guntown, Lee County, Mississippi, near Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Mississippi, Inc. in Blue Springs,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McNair v. StateDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2014