Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1965No. Calendar 56, Docket 50,367PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This time in this case, the chief question for review concerns jury instructions. Other facets of the case are contained in 2 prior reports.1 Essentially, the facts are that a collision occurred in the early afternoon of April 20,1956, at a grade crossing-in the village of Gregory, between one of defendant’s trains and a truck driven by plaintiff. At the point where the accident happened, defendant’s single track crosses highway M 36 almost at right angles. The crossing was marked by a crossbuck sign which was reflectorized, but without warning lights or other crossing protection. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Staal v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Freeman v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Emery v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Baldinger v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Beasley v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. DeCorte v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bauman v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API