Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Feaser

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 Allen Feaser (Feaser) and the Commonwealth cross-appeal from the order of the trial court that limited the number of charges upon which Feaser can be retried. As part of his ruling, the trial judge analyzed and applied the principles of double jeopardy. We affirm.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history can be summarized as follows: In the early morning hours of June 6, 1993, Dwayne Reynolds (Reynolds) and Osvaldo Lopez (Lopez) engaged in a bar brawl. After Reynolds threw Lopez out of the bar, the fight continued outside. Feaser, assisting Reynolds, followed the fight out of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Poland v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McMullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Com. v. Brown, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Com. v. Gross, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Gross, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Postie, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API